Intentional suffering

topic posted Sat, February 23, 2008 - 12:01 PM by  J
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
Does anyone have any thoughts on intentional suffering?
posted by:
J
offline J
Portland
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: Intentional suffering

    Sat, February 23, 2008 - 2:59 PM
    In Zen there is a meditation: Take in all suffering that one can imagine that could be happening in regards to the subject that you want healing for.... Bring this in, and breath it out. Sending out waves of healing, and taking in the pain that is associated with .... say: your sister or your lost love... or the wars of the world.
    In Zen you are given a bag of shit... you examine it... you plant a seed in it, and hand it back a tree.
  • Re: Intentional suffering

    Sat, February 23, 2008 - 5:29 PM
    There are certain experiences that just by the fact that we're humans being slung through time on the planet earth, we're going to get nicked and dented. The problem is that there is so much in our lives we unnecessarily fuss over, it's difficult at times to sort it all out.

    I'd say, possibly, that intentional suffering can be a tool, a method to begin to push you beyond what you consider your perceived limits, which are frequently more flexible than one might think. By extending your limits, what you thought to be suffering can begin to change. One never really arrives at a point where suffering disappears, though one's relationship to the process can begin to transform.

    The problem is that we don't know how to focus what energy we do have onto a proper plan of action to intentionally suffer in the first place, and what generally occurs is a right effort for the wrong reason. We can't see ourselves and due to the way our minds are constructed - we don't know what right work is - as frequently it would be the last thing you would even conceive of. In Gurdjieffian terminology, at least initially, this is a role for a 'teacher'.
  • Re: Intentional suffering

    Wed, March 5, 2008 - 5:07 PM
    I enjoyed reading Charles’ post on this topic. I would add, related to the work of Gurdjieff, the work on experiencing intentional suffering is an important component to the overall work of Gurdjieff. To see our own mechanicalness in almost every aspect of our life, our useless ingrained habits that we don’t often see, and to see the extent of our false personalities is essential in order to see what other possibilities lie beyond our current experiences. To experience intentional suffering is important in the transcendence of change. I think reading up on false personality and buffers could be helpful in understanding intentional suffering more.
    • Re: Intentional suffering

      Thu, March 6, 2008 - 12:49 AM
      "...to see the extent of our false personalities is essential in order to see what other possibilities lie beyond our current experiences."

      An idea that floored Ouspensky while listening to Gurdjieff speak was that of 'the non-expression of negative emotions'. Possibly this idea over and above all others can assist a person in generating a type of internal pressure that will enable them to begin to understand to what extent false personality and buffers actually compose the dynamics of the interface with their environment.
      • Re: Intentional suffering

        Fri, March 7, 2008 - 1:58 PM
        Re: An idea that floored Ouspensky while listening to Gurdjieff speak was that of 'the non-expression of negative emotions'.

        Yes, this may be important to those of us who desire to work on ourselves, yet it is also one of the most misunderstood of Gurdjieff's ideas. I'm not saying that you are misunderstanding this, Charles, as I have read many of your posts and you clearly have a solid grasp of the system; I'm just writing this for the sake of others who may read this thread.

        There is a difference between "the non-expression of negative emotions" and what is known as "bottling up" one's emotions (which is very, very unhealthy). There is a time and place for expressing anger, boredom, and all the rest. Way too much to write in a single post, just wanted to put that out there for any of those new to the Gurdjieff's monumental ideas. I always suggest that, before expressing a negative emotion, one observe it for a time. By giving these feelings attention, by treating them as one would a child (and it's never a good idea to deny or pretend that a child's emotions don't exist), by looking at what our organism is trying to tell us, we can grow to be human beings without quotation marks. But there is a GREAT danger in simply ignoring these negative emotions or they will wreak havoc on our lives.

        Good post, Charles!
        • Re: Intentional suffering

          Fri, March 7, 2008 - 11:46 PM
          www.amazon.com/Why-People...ef=pd_bbs_1

          This thread reminds me of this book for some reason. She discusses what she has termed "Woundology." It's excellent. Anyone familiar with her and if so what do you think?

          - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - -

          I have intentionally suffered at my own hand in the form of alcohol and substance use / abuse and cigarettes for over half my life. ( And poor financial decisions. ) Perhaps that's a diff sub on a diff thread. Not sure. I'll do another shot of Jim Beam and contemplate it now.

          Cheers! Bottoms up! ( Proposition? OPE!!! ) SALUTE!!!
          • Re: Intentional suffering

            Sat, March 8, 2008 - 9:49 AM
            I read that a small amount of Arsenic in a plant makes' it grow taller, greener, live longer etc... Magnesium changes the flowers to a bright purple... A small amount of caffeine kicks you in high gear.... A small amount of psilsyben.... a shot of ginger in the morning...
            Our persona is fenced in by where we go, and also hedged around by where we won't venture.
        • Re: Intentional suffering

          Sat, March 8, 2008 - 10:48 AM
          "There is a difference between "the non-expression of negative emotions" and what is known as "bottling up" one's emotions (which is very, very unhealthy)."

          "I always suggest that, before expressing a negative emotion, one observe it for a time."

          Hank, these are good points. The greatest obstacle to even begin to work with this concept is that we're so tightly bound with the fabric of our lives, that the fluidity of the interface is transparent - that is what Gurdjieff (at least in one respect) refers to 'sleep'. In other words, it's not even an issue of not expressing the negative emotions, it's an issue of seeing them in the first place.

          As you mentioned, observation is the first step. Though, observation of a tendency, just by its very nature, changes one's relationship to a specific set of manifestations - at which point, initially, one may find that even though one may get a glimpse of the trails of negative emotions as they pass, there's frequently little on can do to affect them. Yet, this process begins to create a certain pressure.


  • the concept and practice of intentional suffering is an elitist technique of self-work lost to the greater populace conditioned towards an ever-increasing lifestyle of more convenience and security and its incumbent rewards of assumed status and expectations of entitlement. it is "elitist" simply by virtue that "intentional suffering" is likely to be perceived by the greater populace as undesirable, unpleasant and not worth the time. i use the term "elitist" here not to denote any superiority -- i am aware that we all die someday -- but to reference a very narrow path that escapes any populist agendas of 'enlightenment and spiritual growth for all'.

    my favorite form of Intentional suffering -- going against the grain of the mighty force of habit -- is introducing small inconveniences throughout the day that disrupt my comfortable routines and nurture my excitement for difficulty, for doing something other than 'the easy way'. some examples include walking somewhere i would habitually drive a car to or going to a social gathering of people i think i don't care for or reading a book or magazine where the contents contradict or dismiss my own beliefs.
    • Things like changing your route or associating with people you normally wouldn't - at least in Gurdjieffian terminology would be called being 'out of patterns'.

      To my understanding the main distinction between intentional and unintentional suffering is that much of the discomfort, psychic pain and downright loss of energy that people are susceptible to in general is unintentionally derived, and related to automated negative-type responses - like becoming upset when someone is late or when the temperature isn't right or when someone accidentally spills something on us or whatever. So much of many peoples' lives are spent suffering unintentionally that they've lost the significance of those things they must intentionally suffer, and this is one of the primary reasons behind the exercise related to the non-expression of negative emotions. The act of not expressing a negative emotion provides a certain heat, allowing a person to bring their attention to it, providing an opportunity to evaluate. It's a powerful tool, though It can be a tricky business initially, and one is bound to overshoot and err, but over time it's a good way for a person to see how they're spending their time and where their energy is being spent.
      • Frank Lloyd Wright never took the same road twice. He also struggled throughout life to control his world... and was forced to reinvent himself several times. He also had a family Motto: Follow Nature (the Welsh definition of genius is "one who follows Nature"
        He also believed one must approach a building's entrance in a Zen method, where his logo described this method: a right, a right etcc... spriralling in, and eventually transforming in the center, and releasing this entrance...
        He also had a guru (Sullivan) who developed a wonder organic method of discovering a kind of typology of nature's patterns and had a motto: "Remember the Seed Germ"
        I wonder, did these architects have Gurdjieffian influence? I think it likely, via the influences of people like LeDuc, and other organic thinkers....
        • Shadoan, Wright knew Gurdjieff personally, and was married to one of his earliest disciples -- Olgivanna Milanovich, who organized a Gurdjieff circle in Chicago. She also patterned Wright's apprenticeship program (the Taliesin Fellowship) after Gurdjieff's Institute for the Harmonious Development of Man. Her work with the apprentices often involved encouraging (or inflicting) intentional suffering as a "shock" to promote spiritual growth.

          A fascinating book about the Fellowship came out just a year or two ago:

          www.amazon.com/Fellowship.../ref=sr_1_1

          The book also gives a good deal of information about Gurdjieff, and Wright's encounters with him. Highly recommended!
          • holy crap! wow!~ this makes sense!!! wow! Thanks Od, huge connections in my synapses just made!
            • by the way, I could go on and on about architorture... but, you all know the stories.. The school of Arch is rumored to be one of the hardest... Compared to Marines! I stayed up once for 72 hours.. .and another time 48 and another time 120hours... Working in studio is insane..
              I learned just how much of it came from my curiosity, ie, my lack of discipline to stick with initial designs...
              • Another monolith of 20th century thought, Ayn Rand, authored Atlas Shrugged, and The Fountainhead... in which the chief protagonist was said to have been patterned after F Wright. Ms Rand founded a unique philosophy known as "Objectivism"... and here's another connection>> it's another clone of the Gurdjiefian Work,... yet tailored more to the American sensibility. Influential reading.
                • >>the chief protagonist was said to have been patterned after F Wright<<

                  Another Wright connection -- Rand and Wright met several times, but only after The Fountainhead was published. They developed a sort of mutual admiration laced with friction; neither was quite what the other expected. Wright designed a house for Rand, to be built in California -- unfortunately, that plan was abandoned when Rand moved to New York.

                  gurdjieff.tribe.net/photos/1...2deaebafd

                  Personally, I don't see much similarity between Rand's philosophy and Gurdjieff's, beyond the fact that each, by different methods, had the effect of breaking down conventional ideas and attitudes of Western culture. Rand's attitude toward suffering was more Stoic than anything else, ultimately regarding it as something of little consequence.

                  "Suffering as such is not a value; only man's fight against suffering, is." -- Ayn Rand
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
                    Both Gurdjieff and Rand were early 20th century Russian emigrees.

                    Inasmuch as language can be seen as the infrastructure for particular cultural sensibilities... mentalities, what the two shared was an early formation in pre-Bolshevik Russia. While Gurdjieff and entourage made an epic concerted flight from the reds to the west, Rand chose to adapt to the new system and continued her education under it. she, not unlike G, ultimately rejected that type of control that served to sap personal initiative,... personal choice.... but two of the elements that the two philosophies have in common.
      • Charles

        I appreciate your corrective reply to my post.

        Though my knowledge of Gurdjieffian terminology is next to nil, I can see how 'out of patterns' more accurately addresses my devices for inconveniencing myself than "Intentional suffering". I can also relate to your phrase, "the act of not expressing a negative emotion provides a certain heat"...which I see play out in my daily habits and attentions. My current interest lies with exposing daily habits that drain the energetic body, specifically, the emotional body of 'the heart' in the head/heart/gut trinity. And I find that the expression of negative emotion plays a big part in a certain kind of power loss that I can no longer afford.
        • "emotional body of 'the heart' in the head/heart/gut trinity"

          I'm not certain, but I'd assume that this correlates in G terminology to the centers, which are the moving-instinctive center, emotional center and the intellectual center.

          "And I find that the expression of negative emotion plays a big part in a certain kind of power loss that I can no longer afford."

          Yeah, well welcome to the club. It's an interesting business because we're changing as is the playing field, not to mention the players, who are themselves changing - this ever changing game of musical chairs. Though it does seem to be possible over time to get a little better handle on the process by wedging our fingernails into that crack that separates complete mechanicality from the capability of affecting the slightest degree of control over the process. But I continue to wonder if such thoughts are mere afterthoughts being mechanically produced. I know such thoughts go against the grain. I get the sense more and more that our position in time and space is the key determining factor, and that position is beyond our control. Yet, the mind will on the fly generate the most amazing stories as to why this could not be possible.
        • Sherpa, as unintentional suffering is minimized - what's left is what one must intentionally endure. Sorta simplifies everything, huh ;-)
          • <<Sherpa, as unintentional suffering is minimized - what's left is what one must intentionally endure. Sorta simplifies everything, huh ;-)>>

            and what is it that one must intentionally endure if not the manifestation of others ? :- o
            • Well, that's an interesting question because it brings up the issue of realistically controlling or even the existence of such a capability of directing what goes on in our heads, which I would assume you'd agree is the ultimate playing field where the battle over our perceptions and the responses to them is waged.

              Granted, by implementing various exercises it might appear possible to respond more accurately and effectively to internal and what we deem external stimuli. Yet the thorny question remains as to what it is that generates and controls our personal matrix at any given moment, and if this dynamic is being crafted through the nature of its being suspended at a specific and unique location, and that this is *the* determining factor, either that or somehow there’s an opportunity to swim against the current to calmer waters.

              And furthermore - if that location where we might arrive is but an afterthought, another layer, a more deeply camouflaged destination embedded within our imagination - and if this is the case - does knowing there's nowhere to swim to, knowing this down to the bones - might this ultimately provide the only calm we might ever hope for?

              Yes, an interesting question.
  • Re: Intentional suffering

    Mon, January 5, 2009 - 7:20 AM
    Intentional suffering is suicide and crime in society.
    OM
    • Re: Intentional suffering

      Mon, January 5, 2009 - 9:05 AM
      blue ball point pen IS oak street remote control artificial flower

      The arisotellian "is of identity" can lead to faulty communication.
      • Re: Intentional suffering

        Mon, January 5, 2009 - 12:12 PM
        taking on pain and suffering may be misconstrued as an excercise in Christian forebearance by the unannointed in one's milieu... thus benefitting noone, least of all one's self - a tricky excercise to be undertaken by the expert dialectician only.
  • Re: Intentional suffering

    Tue, January 13, 2009 - 7:17 PM
    Conscious labor and intentional suffering are the first and second conscious shocks.
    • Re: Intentional suffering

      Sun, February 8, 2009 - 2:36 AM
      Peter,

      would you care to expand on this? I take it you have a lot of experience in G groups so I would be very interested to hear your perspective on the first and second conscious shocks and what is meant by these two modes of development
    • Re: Intentional suffering

      Sun, February 8, 2009 - 12:47 PM
      <<Conscious labor and intentional suffering are the first and second conscious shocks.>>

      I take this to mean a kind of 'bumping' the motor (physical labor) and emotional (real suffering; not neurotic) centers into momentary awakening.
    • Re: Intentional suffering

      Sun, February 8, 2009 - 2:44 PM
      couldn't suffering be patience?
      ie. I am suffering the ignorance of my college neighbors, and not calling the gestapo because I don't want people to be cuffed?
      And i don't want to be arrested when I have a birthday party...
      I am suffering the inability of a biz partner/wife/husband, because I shan't assume my own intentions are any better, until they confess mine superior...
      • Re: Intentional suffering

        Sun, February 8, 2009 - 2:56 PM
        pg 198 "the Way of the Sufi" By Indries Shah,
        Mohammed Shah took a group of his Halka (Circle) to see a certain sights......a minaret "this was built by people who persevere"
        Brahmin pigrims walking to the holy Jumna River "these are people who persevere", caravans of Chinese, Tibetan pilgrams stretching their bodies out along the ground per step, magistrates who work to monitor justice, 'Men Everywhere persevere, The yield of this perseverance is what is of account. This they can harvest and use.... If on the other hand, they become beguiled by the thing for which they persevere they cannot make use of the training of the struggle of perseverance. All that happens to them is that they become trained in persevering after some things."
        • Re: Intentional suffering

          Mon, February 9, 2009 - 6:34 AM
          It is the way of the warrior to train in endurance... to absorb pain & punishment, suck it up,... and keep going. Almost all warrior societies have some forms of pain rituals.... many as initiations into higher levels.
          >> Sundance, circumcision, teeth sharpening, scarification & tatooage, fire walking, etc. etcetera.
          ... and some forms have gain through pain as spiritual excercise.

          My motto?....
          No pain,... no pain.
          (pain, what is it good for?)
          Pain can be addictive, and even an end in itself. The furthest I'll go with this is when enduring is applied to a sport objective.
          • Re: Intentional suffering

            Mon, February 9, 2009 - 7:30 AM
            I took a real wack right on the tip of my nose, and saw the tree of nerves in my whole mind!!
            i was staring at a fireplace as my dog jumped in my face and her head bump hit me right on the tip!!
            It was so painful, i closed my eyes and covered my face with my hands... but, this amazing shock of energy went everywhere!!!!
            I cried for the beauty!
            could have never paid me to do that again tho!
          • Re: Intentional suffering

            Mon, February 9, 2009 - 3:43 PM
            Gurdjieff was quite fond of what he called 'super efforts', which is a way of testing a person's limits. Suffering is optional. Such periods of going beyond what you thought were the limits of your endurance can be real eye-openers, and these types of exercises can be related to physical and emotional types of endeavors, I guess even intellectual. Such efforts can be undertaken with others (which is easier) and over time it's possible to cultivate a capacity of applying the concept on more of an individual basis. One teacher I studied with frequently used to remind us that it was quite easy for him to upon us act as the trigger, though that was really nothing; it was simply irrelevant until we'd developed the capacity to initiate such actions for ourselves.
            • Re: Intentional suffering

              Sat, February 21, 2009 - 3:03 AM
              putting yourself in a state of "perceived peril" .....and using that shock to go catapult yourself out of your inertia. Its convenient if your "perceived peril" is psychologically based because when you cant run from something that threatens existence...well ...your forced sit and deal with it and make friends with it even if its a painful process. Because the process of overcoming adversity leads for a brief moment or three two a place where one is overcome.

Recent topics in "Gurdjieff"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Gurdjieff & the Hidden History of the Sufis Od 9 November 30, 2009
Gurdjieff-Bennett Group in Boston Shawnzo 0 November 22, 2009
The Sarmoung and the Yezidis Jesus 22 October 20, 2009
VIDZ Mr. M 0 October 17, 2009