Many interestestd in Gurdjieff's ideas have strong feelings regarding this fellow. What's you're position? Read any of his books?
-
Re: E.J. Gold
Tue, May 2, 2006 - 12:59 PM> What's you're position?
Whirling.
> Read any of his books?
Yes. I recently read most of Meetings with Remarkable Men. -
-
Re: E.J. Gold
Wed, May 3, 2006 - 5:07 PMActually I am interested in people's position on E.J. Gold. I have read all of G's books many times as well as nearly everything else written by his students and students of students. Been to G's hometown of Kars on the Turkey/Armenian border as well as his old Institute in Istanbul. I've also traced many of his "sources", speaking with teachers who had teachers who knew G back during his "Seekers of Truth" days. You can see I'm not a casual seeker. I take the work seriously, but not so seriously that I don't enjoy a good sense of humor. Which is why I like E.J. Gold.
I have read many books by E.J. Gold, particularly enjoying "The Hidden Work", "The Joy of Sacrifice", "Nimbus: The Creation Story According to Mr. G.", "Secret Talks with G.", and especially "The Human Biological Machine as a Transformational Apparatus". Also read "American Book of the Dead", "Lazy Man's Guide to Death and Dying", and "Practical Work on Self" which I found very useful in my work. -
-
Re: E.J. Gold
Fri, May 5, 2006 - 11:50 PMAfter reading several books by EJ Gold over the years while personally knowing half a dozen individuals who have lived with him on his communal compound (some remain, some left), I've come to several conclusions.
Probably my favorite impression is that EJ Gold is no reincarnation of G. I. Gurdjieff. Nor has he achieved any where near Gurdjieff's level of awakening, functioning and transmission.
The simulations of "the work" many of EJ Gold's books addresses (especially "The Human Biological Machine as a Transformational Apparatus") seem to be just that: simulations. I get the impression that he acts out an Imposter Guru archetype, a kind of trickster figure of high intelligence and charisma yet lacking in the internal fortitude to encourage the autonomy of others. I have been told that he is never without the company of two women, as if his essence-eaten personality required these special buffers to protect his fragile ego from the void.
Admittedly these conjectures are based on my subjective reflections and impressions of his books and of knowing some of those who have lived with him for many years. However, with no direct firsthand experience of the man himself, my impressions remain decidedly incomplete and should be considered as such.
-
-
Re: E.J. Gold
Tue, May 9, 2006 - 10:39 PMI seem to agree with you. I've come to several ideas myself over the years including the trickster guru. In almost every Turkish village and most of the dervish lodges I've spent time at, they tell stories about Nasrudin Hodja, whose odd behavior may serve as a waking factor. This is not to say that Gold is awake, I do not know much about him, but his humor in his writing (I could be wrong, but I think it's intentionally humorous) certainly is enjoyable.
I don't think he has claimed any "enlightenment" status. I could be wrong on this. One of the humorous elements was his Fake Sufi School. For some reason, merely the notion of such a group seems clever. Pehaps I like Gold's cleverness and humor more than anything else.
Some in the Gurdjieff Foundation have a very poor view on Gold due to the hilarious "Secret talks with G" and "Nimbus". When i first saw them at the bookstore, I laughed out loud and had to control myself, it was so silly. Not just funny, but just plain silly. I don't find much humor in today's movies or sit-coms, most of them seem so boring and I don't laugh. Perhaps that's another reason I enjoy his books, I can laugh at the absurdity. The absurdity of him dressed up like Gurdjieff and the fact that I'm actually reading a book by somebody who had a Fake Sufi School complete with Snake Fufi Dancing. I guess I also enjoy having an excuse to laugh at the absurd. -
-
Re: E.J. Gold
Thu, May 11, 2006 - 1:03 AMI didn't know Gurdjieffians were prone to humor? I will have to look into this Gold character.
G sort of makes me laugh inside because he reminds me of my grandfather (in looks and posture)..who was always playing tricks. I have to say I do like the austerity and seriousness of Krishnamurti..have a look at this...Google is really quite something!
I randomly picked this one ...in fact it's probably the worst of the bunch.
video.google.com/videoplay
-
-
Re: E.J. Gold
Tue, May 16, 2006 - 12:04 AMI have not yet met Gold personally. However, someone I consider a master considers Gold a master based on having interacted with him at the Institute.
I report this just for another angle.
-
-
-
-
Re: E.J. Gold
Thu, May 11, 2006 - 10:33 PMAnyone know of a link to Gold's the Gabriel Papers etc- like a.... "free" one???
-
Re: E.J. Gold
Thu, July 27, 2006 - 4:20 PMI just got the Human Bio Machine, looks kind of interesting. Like Fourth Way meets Robert Anton Wilson or something! -
-
Re: E.J. Gold
Thu, July 27, 2006 - 9:49 PMYeah, Bob Wilson often references Gold and seems to think highly of him and has written forwards to several of his books. I really loved "Nimbus: The Creation Story According to Mr. G." which later was expanded into "The Creation Story Verbatim". Anybody who has read Beelzebub's Tales will love it (or hate it if they are dogmatic and humorless fourth wayers).
-
-
Re: E.J. Gold
Fri, November 17, 2006 - 7:25 PMmr bluebeard
for e.j. gold
revisiting mr bluebeard at his gothic castle in northern california, with all his nubile corpses, oxymorons, scattered around, i am in a mood of delirious discovery. so nice to finally find what i have been looking for for so long. always good to catch up with the proofs...interesting too to be reminded just how much so much warm blood affects the mind.
dizzying, vertigo and stop. the confusion must have to do with what the old books say.
they say that human blood, especially the menstral blood and sperm--are the most potent magical substances there are.
interesting too, how the quest for healing, which had begun to seem impossible and wrong, is neither. it has been down here all along, waiting with the others.
is this his basement? must be. here's where all their bodies are--shared grave of flesh and bone. concrete walls and floor. no way in or out. here are their eyes no longer seeing, still wide open, staring dumbly into that once-blinding, extinct sun.
that bad sun has set; it was the wrong one.
the expressions on their faces do not change. that last look which also was the first look, remains on them, a shock, a stalled moment of betrayal recognized. it is ah-ha! the satori we all came here for.
the sadness would have happened later, and the rest of it, if they had survived their deaths.
guru, father, lover, child, god. here is the man i trusted most. why steal what has already been given you in full?
they are younger now than when they were alive and they are sisters now, their hands too small and wrongly limp for this thing that's happened to them. i hold each one. i breathe my warmth through their cold noses into them because i feel that this is something that i took from them--their life.
is it possible he can not feel and so he did not know that it was all already his?
i try to give it back to them. my breath makes hollow echoes through their lungs and ribs--the shadow sounds most fully in the spaces where their hearts had been.
we form a circle on the grass in front. we sit cross-legged on the earth. we tell each other our full stories now. the real ones, not made-up, from start to finish now... our individual stories which are different from the rest. then we see what our one story is--hidden then but so obvious now.
this story is the same.
through laughter and shared tears we see now how we got here on the lawn. this is how we forge it, our one story, into stone. we use our blood and breath and we agree. we leave it carved here so we can find it any time, stolen from inside. it is a giant canvas, a wedged-in stone wedded to the ground. we make our marks too deep to be erased.
it'll stay like this: marker, tombstone, plaque. an explanation. exhibition. a warning to lady-travellers by night. a calm and care-filled elucidiation of a fact.
i tell them these heart-warming tales. i stroke their hair and sing them songs. i want to comfort them. i feel important. i still think that i'm alive. i apologize sincerely for the jealousy which made me hate them then. it was because their beauty made me feel so small. i thought i'd disappear. which is why i couldn't love them then. when it would have mattered then. i tell them..... this is why i didn't help. i tell them...
here are my reasons why i did not do a thing.
i say it now, at last, ridiculously, how sorry i am.
at least all that bad business between all of us is finally done.
but of course they can not understand a word.
and then i go to leave and find i can not move.
-
Re: E.J. Gold
Thu, February 22, 2007 - 7:33 PMWhen I read "The Human Biological Machine As A Transformational Apparatus" I was very impressed. I had already read the Secret Talks and fallen for the now obvious charade of it. Then seeking my "Gurdjieff" I got involved with the "Institute" for a couple of years. I've read all his basic books and while I enjoy them, they left me with a feeling similar to "where's the beef". Titilating but with no "Happy Ending". Then I left for the next "Gurdjieff" to come down the pike, and my next learnings. While I feel funny about the imitating of Gurdjieff, I enjoy the humor and theater of Gold's approach. Zen Basics is pure genius, Bardo Bootcamp, the inner clubs and workshops were real, and the video gaming is something I love love. I took on Zelda as recreation and workstation. My life was enriched by playing Zelda with EJ Golds insights into Bardo playing. The way you play in the game mirrors the way you play in "real" life. All things considered, I'd have to say E.J. Gold's world was a positive influence on my life. I appreciate his work and while I have mixed emotions about it, I think the experience of the mixed emotions is just another venue for learning. Now I think that the lack of catharsis in the outer teaching is appropriate, hard to understand, and rare. This is actually something I think we could focus on as a work topic. I can vaguely say it as- what is the difference between cathartic and non-cathartic teachings, or ways? Anyone got any insights?